top of page
Search

The New Media Seat at the White House Is a Win — Whether the Establishment Likes It or Not

  • Writer: Jason Abt
    Jason Abt
  • Apr 27
  • 4 min read

Updated: May 6

Outsider media just crashed the gate—and legacy media’s losing it.

Text promotes "Independent Voices Break Through: Why Outsider Media Matters at the White House" with a microphone icon on a dark flag backdrop.

There’s been a lot of noise lately about Tim Pool sitting in the White House briefing room, and honestly, the reaction from legacy media has been ridiculous. I read the Daily Beast article whining about it — “Time to Pull the Plug on Trump's White House Press Pool” — and it’s everything you’d expect. A bunch of gatekeepers throwing a fit because someone outside their little club got a seat at the table.


But here’s the thing: this is exactly why we need outsider media at places like the White House. And it’s exactly why the new media seat matters more than ever.



Legacy Media Lost the Plot


First off, let’s be real: the so-called “mainstream” media lost their credibility years ago. They don’t even try to hide their bias anymore. It’s not about reporting facts — it’s about controlling narratives. And when someone like Tim Pool, who built his career on being independent and calling it how he sees it, steps into their playground, they lose their minds.


The Daily Beast basically argues that traditional outlets should boycott the White House press pool entirely — because they can’t stand sharing the room with an outsider.


Think about that. Instead of stepping up their game, asking better questions, or adapting to a changing media landscape, their solution is to take their ball and go home.

That’s not journalism. That’s entitlement.



Tim Pool Represents What Journalism Should Be


People like Tim Pool aren’t perfect — nobody is — but he represents something we haven’t had for a long time: an actual independent voice. Not owned by corporate sponsors. Not obsessed with protecting political favorites. Just someone trying to dig for the truth, even if it doesn’t fit a pre-approved narrative.


The fact that the White House press office under Trump — and now under Karoline Leavitt — is letting in new media is a breath of fresh air. It’s a reminder that journalism isn’t supposed to belong to CNN, NBC, or The New York Times.

It belongs to the people.


Journalists are supposed to be watchdogs — not lapdogs.If legacy media can’t handle someone asking different questions, maybe the problem isn’t Tim Pool.

Maybe it’s them.



Why the Establishment Fears Outsiders


Let’s be honest: it’s not really about Tim Pool himself.

It’s about what he represents.


He’s proof that you don’t need a billion-dollar company to hold power accountable.

You just need a camera, an internet connection, and a spine.


That terrifies the establishment media.

Because if outsiders can get real access, it breaks their monopoly over information. They can't just spoon-feed the American people carefully curated talking points anymore. They can’t control the questions being asked. They can't spin reality as easily.


That’s why they want him gone. That’s why they want the new media seat to fail.



They Loved Diversity... Until It Meant Diversity of Thought


Isn’t it funny? These same media outlets love to preach about "diversity" and "representation" all day long.But when it comes to diversity of thought — people who think differently, challenge the narrative, and question power — suddenly they want to slam the door shut.


If you’re not part of their ideological bubble, you’re not welcome.


Tim Pool isn’t part of their bubble.

Neither are independent journalists, citizen reporters, or people building platforms outside the system.And that’s a good thing. America was built on the idea that anyone — not just the elites — could challenge authority.



A Little History: Tim Pool Has Earned His Seat


Let’s not forget: Tim Pool didn’t pop out of nowhere.

  • He was on the ground during Occupy Wall Street when the mainstream media wasn’t even paying attention yet.

  • He streamed real footage from protests that legacy outlets either ignored or twisted.

  • He covered stories like Rittenhouse in a way that actually looked at the facts — not just emotion-driven propaganda.

  • He built a massive following without backing from CNN, MSNBC, or any of the old guard.


He earned his credibility the hard way.

He showed up. He reported. He took the hits.

He deserves to be there more than half the career hacks sitting in that briefing room right now.



The Future of Journalism Is Decentralized


We’re living through a media revolution whether the establishment likes it or not.

  • You don’t need CNN to get the news.

  • You don’t need to wait for a New York Times front page.

  • You don’t need permission from a blue checkmark.


You can find independent voices everywhere now — podcasts, YouTube, Substack, Rumble, X.The internet changed everything. And thank God it did.


Because if we were still relying on the old media machine, we’d all be stuck in an information blackout right now.


The Daily Beast is panicking because they know their era is ending.And deep down, they’re terrified they can’t compete on a level playing field anymore.



Final Thoughts: The Seat Belongs to the People, Not the Media Class


The White House new media seat isn’t just about Tim Pool.

It’s about whether the American people still get to have a voice in what questions are asked.

It’s about whether journalism stays a tool of the elite — or goes back to being what it’s supposed to be: a check on power.


The establishment doesn’t want to adapt.

They want to go back to the old days, where they controlled the flow of information, and everyone else just had to sit down and take it.

Too bad.

The future is here.The gatekeepers can either get on board or get out of the way.


I’ll take 100 Tim Pools asking real questions over another 1,000 legacy media hacks reading scripted ones any day.


What do you think? Is outsider media the future of journalism? Or should the White House stick to letting only the “approved” journalists ask questions? I'd love to hear your thoughts.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page